Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus

New York Supreme Court

Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus

26 N.Y.S. 1115, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640

DecidedDecember 15, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1115 (Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus, 26 N.Y.S. 1115, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The fact that the money was loaned gives no ground of arrest. The only ground upon which this order of arrest can be sustained is that the defendant has fraudulently disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. The allegations in the affidavits wholly fail to set up any facts from which any such conclusion can be drawn, and are therefore wholly insufficient. The order should be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with §10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The fact that the money was loaned gives no ground of arrest. The only ground upon which this order of arrest can be sustained is that the defendant has fraudulently disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. The allegations in the affidavits wholly fail to set up any facts from which any such conclusion can be drawn, and are therefore wholly insufficient. The order should be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with §10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1115, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ong-sing-v-hom-mon-dus-nysupct-1893.