Oney v. Needham
This text of 216 N.E.2d 625 (Oney v. Needham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court’s attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 N.E.2d 625, 6 Ohio St. 2d 154, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 223, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oney-v-needham-ohio-1966.