Oney v. Needham
216 N.E.2d 625, 6 Ohio St. 2d 154, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 223, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 360
Opinion
The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court’s attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oney v. Needham, 216 N.E.2d 625, 6 Ohio St. 2d 154, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 223, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 360 (Ohio 1966).
216 N.E.2d 625 (Oney v. Needham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Father
2017 Ohio 7397 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
In re T.C.K.
2013 Ohio 3583 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
In Re J.J., Unpublished Decision (2-8-2007)
2007 Ohio 535 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Becker v. Hurley, Unpublished Decision (9-13-2005)
2005 Ohio 4950 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
In Re Johnson, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2004)
2004 Ohio 3886 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Monkey Joes, Inc. v. Olcc, Unpublished Decision (3-4-2004)
2004 Ohio 1010 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Dewey v. Olson, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
Waller v. Aggarwal
688 N.E.2d 274 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)
Katko v. Modic
621 N.E.2d 809 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)
In Re Rabatin
615 N.E.2d 1099 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)
State v. Lorraine
5 Ohio App. Unrep. 332 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland
322 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975)