Onewest Bank v. Wegesend
This text of Onewest Bank v. Wegesend (Onewest Bank v. Wegesend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000882 07-MAR-2017 10:44 AM
SCWC-15-0000882
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
ONEWEST BANK, N.A., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WARREN ROBERT WEGESEND, SR. and THELLDINE LINMOE WEGESEND,
Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants,
and
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK and MILILANI TOWN ASSOCIATION,
Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000882; CIVIL NO. 13-1-0909)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Warren Robert
Wegesend, Sr., and Thelldine Linmoe Wegesend’s Application for
Writ of Certiorari, filed January 27, 2017, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 7, 2017.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Onewest Bank v. Wegesend, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onewest-bank-v-wegesend-haw-2017.