Oneto v. Greenberg

265 A.D. 866, 37 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6237
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D. 866 (Oneto v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oneto v. Greenberg, 265 A.D. 866, 37 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

The trial presented a dispute between the defendant and an allegedly disinterested eye witness for the respondent. The two versions of how the accident happened were in sharp conflict and were irreconcilable. The jury accepted the defendant’s version, which was amply supported by evidence which the jury had the right to find was credible. The learned trial justice was without power to assume the jury’s function and to decide where the truth lay. (Lee v. City Brewing Corp., 279 N. Y. 380, 384; Scheuerman v. Knapp Coal Co., Inc., 238 App. Div. 874.) Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dershwitz v. City of New York
267 A.D. 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 866, 37 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneto-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-1942.