Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/O'Neill v. State

O'Neill v. State

922 So. 2d 1030, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 2006 WL 452778
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-4043
StatusPublished

This text of 922 So. 2d 1030 (O'Neill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neill v. State, 922 So. 2d 1030, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 2006 WL 452778 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carla M. O’Neill appeals an order denying in part her motion to correct illegal sentence imposed after she entered a plea of guilty to violation of probation. Based on the State’s concession, we reverse the order insofar as it denies the motion to correct illegal sentence and remand for further proceedings. See Harrison v. State, 523 So.2d 726, 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), disapproved of on other grounds, Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. State
523 So. 2d 726 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Roberts v. State
547 So. 2d 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 So. 2d 1030, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676, 2006 WL 452778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.