O'Neill v. Slater
This text of 4 A.D.2d 883 (O'Neill v. Slater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law, without as costs. The findings of fact are affirmed. The statutory disqualification is confined to the acceptance or the holding of the incompatible public office and not to the candidate’s nomination or his right to be elected to such office. Beldock, Acting P. J., Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm on the authority of Matter of Burns v. Wiltse (303 N. Y. 319) and upon the opinion of the learned Justice at Special Term. [8 Misc 2d 429.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 883, 167 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-slater-nyappdiv-1957.