O'Neill v. Self

161 S.E. 277, 44 Ga. App. 322, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 705
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1931·No. 21323·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

This being a suit for damages for the alleged conversion of certain cotton, and there being, under the pleadings and the evidence, an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff had agreed that the cotton might be taken and disposed of as was done by the defendants, one witness having testified positively to an admission by the plaintiff that he made such an agreement, it was error as against the defendants for the court to charge the jury that the evidence presented no issue- as to whether such an agreement had been entered into by the parties, and, the jury having found a verdict for the plaintiff, the court should have granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Jenloins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neill v. Self, 161 S.E. 277, 44 Ga. App. 322, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 705 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

161 S.E. 277 (O'Neill v. Self) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. Self
186 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)