O'Neill v. Priest

Supreme Court of Colorado

O'Neill v. Priest

387 P.2d 727, 154 Colo. 35, 1963 Colo. LEXIS 269

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedDecember 23, 1963

DocketNo. 20,780

StatusPublished

This text of 387 P.2d 727 (O'Neill v. Priest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Neill v. Priest, 387 P.2d 727, 154 Colo. 35, 1963 Colo. LEXIS 269 (Colo. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Frantz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Attorney General has confessed error in this case, based upon our recent opinion in the case of The District Attorney in and for the County of Alamosa v. The District Court in and for the County of Alamosa, 150 Colo. 136, 371 P. (2d) 271. We agree with the Attorney General that the cited case is determinative of the question involved in this writ of error and that the principle therein enunciated requires a reversal of this case.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Frantz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Attorney General has confessed error in this case, based upon our recent opinion in the case of The District Attorney in and for the County of Alamosa v. The District Court in and for the County of Alamosa, 150 Colo. 136, 371 P. (2d) 271. We agree with the Attorney General that the cited case is determinative of the question involved in this writ of error and that the principle therein enunciated requires a reversal of this case.

The judgment is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

387 P.2d 727, 154 Colo. 35, 1963 Colo. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-priest-colo-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack