O'Neill v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

O'Neill v. O'Neill

12 A.2d 839, 127 N.J. Eq. 278, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 611

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 25, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 12 A.2d 839 (O'Neill v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Neill v. O'Neill, 12 A.2d 839, 127 N.J. Eq. 278, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 611 (N.J. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery denying the application of the complainant wife for . an increase of alimony. At the foot of the decree provision is made that either party, contingent upon a change of circumstances of either, may seek a modification of the decree in the future.

On the sparse record before us we conclude that the finding of the learned advisory master had proper regard for the condition and station in life of the complainant and the ability of the defendant to pay. We are in accord with the conclusion at which he arrived.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Persicie, Porter, Ueteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For modification — Donges, Heher, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI