Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/O'Neill v. O'Neill

O'Neill v. O'Neill

606 So. 2d 1254, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11245, 1992 WL 308849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2617
StatusPublished

This text of 606 So. 2d 1254 (O'Neill v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 606 So. 2d 1254, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11245, 1992 WL 308849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order that denies attorney’s fees, and reverse the remainder of the trial court’s order. See Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So.2d 519 (Fla. 4th DCA1991).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

HERSEY, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cibula v. Cibula
578 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 So. 2d 1254, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11245, 1992 WL 308849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-oneill-fladistctapp-1992.