O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway

87 A.D. 556
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 A.D. 556 (O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway, 87 A.D. 556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Goodrich, P. J.:

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The latter appeals from an order denying its motion for a bill of particulars as to the injuries which the plaintiff alleged that she believed were permanent and as to the length of time during which plaintiff was confined to her home.

Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (70 App. Div. 1) and Curtin v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (65 id. 610) are authority that under a similar complaint the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars specifying what injuries the plaintiff claims to be permanent ; and Steinau v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (63 App. Div. 126) is authority that the defendant is entitled to a statement of the length of time the plaintiff was confined to her home as a result of her injuries.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted so as to require the plaintiff to furnish the two items herein referred to,- without costs.

Woodward, Hirschberg Jenks and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted so as to require the plaintiff to furnish the two items referred to in the opinion, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeRoire v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
205 A.D. 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Williams v. Chattanooga Iron Works
131 Tenn. 683 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Ferris v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
116 A.D. 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-interurban-street-railway-nyappdiv-1903.