O'neill v. Goodman Contracting Co.
This text of 153 N.Y.S. 727 (O'neill v. Goodman Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the charge of the court the jury were instructed that the plaintiff could not recover unless they found that the defendant left a plank that was so defective or broken that her foot and leg went through it. “It was a defective plank, and her leg went through the hole, or she is not in court.” That, therefore, is the law of the case. The finding of the jury that there was such a defective plank, and that the accident occurred in the way described by the plaintiff, is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
Such finding, and the judgment and order appealed from, should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 N.Y.S. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-goodman-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1915.