O'Neill v. Erie Railroad
143 A.D. 950
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the negligence for which a recovery was had is not sufficiently alleged in the complaint. (See Pagnillo v. Mack Paving & Construction Co., 142 App. Div. 491.) Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Neill v. Erie Railroad, 143 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 950 (O'Neill v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pagnillo v. Mack Paving & Construction Co.
142 A.D. 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)