O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers

245 N.W. 582, 261 Mich. 106, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 695
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1932·No. Calendar 36,980·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the constitutional provision (article 5, § 15) that “Each house shall judge of the qualifications, elections and returns of its members, ’ ’ as construed and applied by this court in Dingeman v. State Board of Canvassers, 198 Mich. 135, and the authorities there cited, the State board of canvassers has no authority or power to recount the votes cast for a representative in the State legislature.

An order will be entered granting the petitioner the relief prayed for in his petition. No costs will be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers, 245 N.W. 582, 261 Mich. 106, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 695 (Mich. 1932).

245 N.W. 582 (O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dingeman v. State Board of Canvassers
164 N.W. 492 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)