O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers

245 N.W. 582, 261 Mich. 106, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 695
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1932
DocketCalendar 36,980
StatusPublished

This text of 245 N.W. 582 (O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neill v. Board of State Canvassers, 245 N.W. 582, 261 Mich. 106, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 695 (Mich. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the constitutional provision (article 5, § 15) that “Each house shall judge of the qualifications, elections and returns of its members, ’ ’ as construed and applied by this court in Dingeman v. State Board of Canvassers, 198 Mich. 135, and the authorities there cited, the State board of canvassers has no authority or power to recount the votes cast for a representative in the State legislature.

An order will be entered granting the petitioner the relief prayed for in his petition. No costs will be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dingeman v. State Board of Canvassers
164 N.W. 492 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 N.W. 582, 261 Mich. 106, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-board-of-state-canvassers-mich-1932.