O'Neill v. Board of Regents
This text of 272 A.D.2d 1086 (O'Neill v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Beview, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, of respondent’s final determination, adopted June 20,' 1947, suspending petitioner’s license as a physiotherapist and registration for one year. The evidence established that petitioner knowingly aided and abetted one Dennis to practice physiotherapy while the latter was unlicensed to practice medicine generally or in the limited field. Physiotherapy in its general sense is “the treatment of disease by physical remedies rather than drugs ” and its practice is the practice of medicine in that limited field. (People V. Mari, 260 N. Y. 383, 385; People v. Dennis, 271 App. Div. 526.) Thus petitioner’s misconduct was properly determined as fraud and deceit in the practice of his profession, and the disciplining thereof was within the juris-. [1087]*1087diction of the respondent Board. (Education Law, former §§ 1250, 1264, 1265.) The determination should be confirmed and stay vacated. Determination confirmed and stay vacated, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-board-of-regents-nyappdiv-1947.