O'Neil v. Pompeil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Neil v. Pompeil

261 A.D. 869, 24 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 869 (O'Neil v. Pompeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Neil v. Pompeil, 261 A.D. 869, 24 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— -Appeal from an order of the Broome County Court made and entered on November 10, 1939, and a judgment rendered on the same day, affirming a judgment of the City Court of Binghamton, rendered on May 8, 1939, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, in the sum of $164.30 damages. This action is for damages to plaintiff’s automobile as the result of a collision on September 20, 1938, between plaintiff’s automobile and an automobile owned by the defendant and operated by defendant’s son. The answer denies liability and sets up a counterclaim. The case was originally tried by the City Court of the City of Binghamton, without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $164.30 damages and $29.33 costs. This judgment has been affirmed by the County Court of Broome County. The evidence showed that plaintiff’s automobile was proceeding along Broad avenue in the city of Binghamton behind that of the defendant and that defendant’s car stopped suddenly and without warning. After the accident the defendant agreed to pay for the repairs to plaintiff’s car and went to the garage where the same was repaired and stated that he was going to pay for them. It was shown that the defendant’s son, who was driving the car at the time of the accident, had on previous occasions driven the car. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present— Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenck, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— -Appeal from an order of the Broome County Court made and entered on November 10, 1939, and a judgment rendered on the same day, affirming a judgment of the City Court of Binghamton, rendered on May 8, 1939, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, in the sum of $164.30 damages. This action is for damages to plaintiff’s automobile as the result of a collision on September 20, 1938, between plaintiff’s automobile and an automobile owned by the defendant and operated by defendant’s son. The answer denies liability and sets up a counterclaim. The case was originally tried by the City Court of the City of Binghamton, without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $164.30 damages and $29.33 costs. This judgment has been affirmed by the County Court of Broome County. The evidence showed that plaintiff’s automobile was proceeding along Broad avenue in the city of Binghamton behind that of the defendant and that defendant’s car stopped suddenly and without warning. After the accident the defendant agreed to pay for the repairs to plaintiff’s car and went to the garage where the same was repaired and stated that he was going to pay for them. It was shown that the defendant’s son, who was driving the car at the time of the accident, had on previous occasions driven the car. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present— Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenck, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 869, 24 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-v-pompeil-nyappdiv-1941.