O'Neil v. Dougherty
46 Cal. 575
Opinion
The bankruptcy of Dougherty, the appellant, though adjudicated before the taking of the appeal, will not prevent its prosecution in his name, nor will the respondent be heard to object on that ground. The appeal may be prosecuted in the name of the bankrupt, or in that of his assignee. (Code Civil Procedure, Sec. 385.) Besides, it is shown that the assignee is really conducting the appeal here, though in the name of the bankrupt.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Neil v. Dougherty, 46 Cal. 575 (Cal. 1873).
46 Cal. 575 (O'Neil v. Dougherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fahlstrom v. Denk
23 P.2d 325 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Woods v. Berry
296 P. 332 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Box v. Kelso
31 P. 973 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
Taylor v. Elliott
53 Ind. 441 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Flanagan v. Pearson
42 Tex. 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)