O'Neil v. Department of Social Security
This text of 121 P.2d 396 (O'Neil v. Department of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court reversing an order of the state department of social security. January 9, 1941, one Lydia C. O’Neil, who was a recipient of an old-age assistance grant, requested authorization from the administrator of the Thurston county welfare department for optical care, to be rendered by a licensed optometrist. This request was denied, and the applicant appealed to the department of social security. That department likewise denied the request, from which the applicant appealed to the superior court. The trial in that court resulted in findings of fact and conclusions which sus *335 tained the application. From the judgment reversing the order of the department of social security, that department appealed.
There is no difference, in principle, between this case and the case of Martin v. Department of Social Security, ante p. 329, 121 P. (2d) 394, just decided. That case was one asking for sanipractic treatment, while this one is requesting treatment by a licensed optometrist. That case is controlling upon this appeal.
The attorney’s fee in this, case is fixed in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Robinson, C. J., Beals, Blake, Jeffers, and Driver, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 P.2d 396, 12 Wash. 2d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-v-department-of-social-security-wash-1942.