O'NEIL v. Corrick
This text of 239 N.W.2d 230 (O'NEIL v. Corrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by plaintiff, acting as his own attorney, from judgment entered against him in an action against the attorneys who represented his deceased former wife in her divorce suit against him, a suit which ended in settlement. We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s action and granted defendants summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to comply with an order that he either provide full and complete answers to written interrogatories within 30 days or have his action dismissed, and there *498 fore dismissal or default judgment was justified under Rule 37.02 (2) (c), Rules of Civil Procedure.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 N.W.2d 230, 307 Minn. 497, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-v-corrick-minn-1976.