O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
This text of 180 Misc. 542 (O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The proofs show that plaintiff was employed in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. [543]*543Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and entitled to recover liquidated damages in the sum of $423.16 by reason of defendant’s default in making overtime payments as directed therein. The sum of $200 is fixed as a reasonable attorney’s fee.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for $623.16 with interest on $423.16 from August 30, 1940, and costs.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 Misc. 542, 43 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-v-brooklyn-savings-bank-nyappterm-1943.