O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

180 Misc. 542, 43 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2101
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 10, 1943·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The proofs show that plaintiff was employed in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. [543]*543Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and entitled to recover liquidated damages in the sum of $423.16 by reason of defendant’s default in making overtime payments as directed therein. The sum of $200 is fixed as a reasonable attorney’s fee.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for $623.16 with interest on $423.16 from August 30, 1940, and costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank, 180 Misc. 542, 43 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

180 Misc. 542 (O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bess v. Toia
66 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Menasche v. Interoceanic Commodities Corp.
6 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil
324 U.S. 697 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Katz v. Film Metal Box Corp.
181 Misc. 812 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1944)
Withers v. Herbert McLean Purdy Management Corp.
181 Misc. 724 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
Rigopoulos v. Kervan
53 F. Supp. 829 (S.D. New York, 1943)