O'Neil-Barrett v. Dept. of Corrections
This text of 490 P.3d 188 (O'Neil-Barrett v. Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted June 4, OAR 291-105-0005 to 291-105-0010 held valid July 8, petition for review denied August 26, 2021 (368 Or 514)
LIAM O’NEIL-BARRETT, Petitioner, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Department of Corrections A175170 490 P3d 188
Liam O’Neil-Barrett filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM OAR 291-105-0005 to 291-105-0010 held valid. Barrett v. Dept. of Corrections, 203 Or App 196, 125 P3d 98 (2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 P.3d 188, 313 Or. App. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-barrett-v-dept-of-corrections-orctapp-2021.