Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish
130 F.2d 255, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078
Opinion
The findings of the referee must stand unless “clearly erroneous.” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e) (2), 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c. In this case not only is that not true, but they are plainly correct; the bankrupt was shown beyond peradventure to be totally undeserving of a discharge. It is hard to see on what theory he could have expected the appeal to succeed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish, 130 F.2d 255, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078 (2d Cir. 1942).
130 F.2d 255 (Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abrams v. Astor
170 F.2d 544 (Second Circuit, 1948)
Diamond Laundry Corp. v. California Employment Stabilization Commission
162 F.2d 398 (Ninth Circuit, 1947)