Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish

Second Circuit

Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish

130 F.2d 255, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 6, 1942

DocketNo. 311

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 130 F.2d 255 (Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oneida Valley Nat. Bank v. Balish, 130 F.2d 255, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078 (2d Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The findings of the referee must stand unless “clearly erroneous.” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e) (2), 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c. In this case not only is that not true, but they are plainly correct; the bankrupt was shown beyond peradventure to be totally undeserving of a discharge. It is hard to see on what theory he could have expected the appeal to succeed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The findings of the referee must stand unless “clearly erroneous.” Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e) (2), 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c. In this case not only is that not true, but they are plainly correct; the bankrupt was shown beyond peradventure to be totally undeserving of a discharge. It is hard to see on what theory he could have expected the appeal to succeed.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 F.2d 255, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneida-valley-nat-bank-v-balish-ca2-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack