Oneida National Bank v. Nelepovitz (In re Nelepovitz)

N.D. New York

Oneida National Bank v. Nelepovitz (In re Nelepovitz)

61 B.R. 301, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4771

District Court, N.D. New York·Decided October 22, 1984·No. Bankruptcy No. 84-00463; Adv. No. 84-1001·Published

Opinion

LEON J. MARKETOS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon reading and filing of the Complaint, Answer with Affirmative Defenses and after James F. Selbach appearing on behalf of the debtor/defendant and Sheldon G. Kali appearing on behalf of the plaintiff and after the said James F. Sel-bach moving for an order dismissing the complaint, and after due deliberation having been had,

NOW, upon the motion of James F. Sel-bach, it is

ORDERED, that the motion be and the same is GRANTED, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Complaint be and the same is dismissed as the Summons and Complaint was not personally served upon the debtor within ten days after the issuance of the Summons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEON J. MARKETOS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon reading and filing of the Complaint, Answer with Affirmative Defenses and after James F. Selbach appearing on behalf of the debtor/defendant and Sheldon G. Kali appearing on behalf of the plaintiff and after the said James F. Sel-bach moving for an order dismissing the complaint, and after due deliberation having been had,

NOW, upon the motion of James F. Sel-bach, it is

ORDERED, that the motion be and the same is GRANTED, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Complaint be and the same is dismissed as the Summons and Complaint was not personally served upon the debtor within ten days after the issuance of the Summons.

Oneida National Bank v. Nelepovitz (In re Nelepovitz), 61 B.R. 301, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4771 (N.D.N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

61 B.R. 301 (Oneida National Bank v. Nelepovitz (In re Nelepovitz)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.