Oneida County Commissioner of Social Services v. William S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oneida County Commissioner of Social Services v. William S.

239 A.D.2d 935, 659 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D.2d 935 (Oneida County Commissioner of Social Services v. William S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oneida County Commissioner of Social Services v. William S., 239 A.D.2d 935, 659 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly directed respondent to contribute to the support of his minor daughter. The daughter moved out of respondent’s two-room efficiency apartment after the birth of her child and began receiving public assistance benefits. Respondent acknowledged that his living quarters were too small to accommodate his daughter and the baby. Under the circumstances, the legal obligation of respondent to support his 19-year-old daughter continued after she left his home- (see, Matter of Henry v Boyd, 99 AD2d 382, affd 65 NY2d 645; see also, Matter of Monroe County Dept. of Social Seros. [San Filippo] v San Filippo, 178 AD2d 1011, 1012; Matter of Sanders v Lavine, 59 AD2d 911). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Morgan, J.—Support.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly directed respondent to contribute to the support of his minor daughter. The daughter moved out of respondent’s two-room efficiency apartment after the birth of her child and began receiving public assistance benefits. Respondent acknowledged that his living quarters were too small to accommodate his daughter and the baby. Under the circumstances, the legal obligation of respondent to support his 19-year-old daughter continued after she left his home- (see, Matter of Henry v Boyd, 99 AD2d 382, affd 65 NY2d 645; see also, Matter of Monroe County Dept. of Social Seros. [San Filippo] v San Filippo, 178 AD2d 1011, 1012; Matter of Sanders v Lavine, 59 AD2d 911). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Morgan, J.—Support.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 935, 659 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneida-county-commissioner-of-social-services-v-william-s-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack