O'Neal v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
Docket02-2357
StatusUnpublished

This text of O'Neal v. United States (O'Neal v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neal v. United States, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2357

ROSE M. O’NEAL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER; CHAMPUS, Department of Defense,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-870-A)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rose M. O’Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment

dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States,

CA-02-870-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
O'Neal v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneal-v-united-states-ca4-2003.