O'Neal v. United States

Fourth Circuit

O'Neal v. United States

55 F. App'x 143

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2003·No. No. 02-2357·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States, CA-02-870-A (E.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rose M. O’Neal appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See O’Neal v. United States, CA-02-870-A (E.D.Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

O'Neal v. United States, 55 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 143 (O'Neal v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related