O'Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Neal v. State

465 S.W.3d 82, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2015 WL 3961100

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·No. No. ED 101501·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony O’Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo (2000). He was sentenced to a term of life in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony O’Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo (2000). He was sentenced to a term of life in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

O'Neal v. State, 465 S.W.3d 82, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2015 WL 3961100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

465 S.W.3d 82 (O'Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.