O'Neal v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

O'Neal v. State

105 So. 496, 140 Miss. 182, 1925 Miss. LEXIS 249

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 5, 1925

DocketNo. 24902.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 496 (O'Neal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Neal v. State, 105 So. 496, 140 Miss. 182, 1925 Miss. LEXIS 249 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Holden, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appeal is from a conviction on the charge of selling intoxicating liquor in the Third justice of the peace *184 district of Jefferson county. At the trial, the state failed to prove the alleged sale took place in the said justice district No. 3 of said county, but attempted to prove venue by showing that the sale occurred in a town by the name of Harriston, in Jefferson county. The appellant contends the judgment should be reversed, because no venue was proven.

We think the point is well taken, and that proof that the sale took place in the Third justice district as alleged in the affidavit was necessary in order to establish the venue. Proof alone that the sale took place in a town is not sufficient, as held by this court in Elzcy v. State, 110 Miss. 502, 70 So. 579.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI