O'Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

O'Neal v. State

188 S.E. 335, 183 Ga. 306, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 602

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1936·No. No. 11451·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The motion for a new trial complaining of the verdict finding the defendant guilty of murder, and recommending him to the mercy of the court, is based on the usual general grounds, and makes no complaint of any error of law committed on the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jusliees concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

The motion for a new trial complaining of the verdict finding the defendant guilty of murder, and recommending him to the mercy of the court, is based on the usual general grounds, and makes no complaint of any error of law committed on the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jusliees concur.

O'Neal v. State, 188 S.E. 335, 183 Ga. 306, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 602 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

188 S.E. 335 (O'Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.