O'Neal v. State
581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6845, 1991 WL 118230
This text of 581 So. 2d 654 (O'Neal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Neal v. State, 581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6845, 1991 WL 118230 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
The appellant challenges special conditions eleven and eighteen of his probation. We find that the trial court correctly imposed condition eighteen, but strike condition eleven because there was no oral pronouncement of this condition by the trial court at the plea and sentencing hearing. Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d [655]*655DCA 1989). In all other aspects, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. State
542 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6845, 1991 WL 118230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneal-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.