O'Neal v. State
444 So. 2d 1142, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1984·No. No. AT-179·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
REVERSED. Donald v. State, 442 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1983); Phillips v. State, 438 So.2d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public importance:
Is a circuit court deprived of subject-matter jurisdiction when the caption of the charging document charges the defendant[s] with felony petit theft and the body thereof cites the proper Florida Statute, § 812.014(2)(c), but the text of the charge alleges the value of the property to be less than $100 and does not specify the substantive elements of two prior petit theft convictions?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Neal v. State, 444 So. 2d 1142, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
444 So. 2d 1142 (O'Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
El-Ra-Sul v. State
456 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)