O'Neal v. State

118 S.W.3d 580, 354 Ark. 280, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 476
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Neal v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 Ark. 674
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 25, 2003·No. CR 03-980·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Attorney Thomas B. Devine III, a full-time public defender for the Sixth Judicial District, has filed a motion asking to be relieved from representing Appellant Ronald O’Neal on appeal. Appellant was convicted in the Pulaski County Circuit Court of capital murder and was sentenced to fife without parole.

Mr. Devine asserts that because he is a full-time public defender with a full-time state-funded secretary, he is ineligible for compensation for work performed regarding this appeal, pursuant to this court’s holding in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000). He therefore requests this court to relieve him of his duties on appeal. We grant Mr. Devine’s motion to be relieved for good cause shown. See Munn v. State, 351 Ark. 324, 92 S.W.3d 63 (2002) (per curiam); Newman v. State, 350 Ark. 265, 85 S.W.3d 883 (2002) (per curiam). Mark Murphy Henry, of Fayetteville, will be substituted as Appellant’s attorney in this matter.

It is so ordered.

Thornton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neal v. State, 118 S.W.3d 580, 354 Ark. 280, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 476 (Ark. 2003).

118 S.W.3d 580 (O'Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rushing v. State
8 S.W.3d 489 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Newman v. State
85 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)
Munn v. State
92 S.W.3d 63 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)