O'Neal v. O'Neal

407 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1981·No. No. 81-468·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The.judgment appealed from is affirmed. We repeat our admonition as enunciated in Moore v. Moore, 401 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981): “In the future we urge that the trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction in these cases without resort to ‘nominal’ alimony awards.” Id. at 842.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, Chief Judge, and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neal v. O'Neal, 407 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

407 So. 2d 1011 (O'Neal v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gergen v. Gergen
48 So. 3d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Dolfi v. Dolfi
667 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Kelly v. State
407 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)