O'Neal v. O'Neal

407 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1981
DocketNo. 81-468
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 407 So. 2d 1011 (O'Neal v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Neal v. O'Neal, 407 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The.judgment appealed from is affirmed. We repeat our admonition as enunciated in Moore v. Moore, 401 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981): “In the future we urge that the trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction in these cases without resort to ‘nominal’ alimony awards.” Id. at 842.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, Chief Judge, and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gergen v. Gergen
48 So. 3d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Dolfi v. Dolfi
667 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Kelly v. State
407 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneal-v-oneal-fladistctapp-1981.