O'Neal v. Brennan

Fourth Circuit

O'Neal v. Brennan

615 F. App'x 802

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 11, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1622

StatusPublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 802 (O'Neal v. Brennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Neal v. Brennan, 615 F. App'x 802 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gena O’Neal appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because O’Neal’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, O’Neil has forfeited appellate review 'of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gena O’Neal appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because O’Neal’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, O’Neil has forfeited appellate review 'of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 F. App'x 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneal-v-brennan-ca4-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack