One Step Up, Inc. v. Coney Z Trading, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

One Step Up, Inc. v. Coney Z Trading, Inc.

276 A.D.2d 760, 715 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11006

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 760 (One Step Up, Inc. v. Coney Z Trading, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

One Step Up, Inc. v. Coney Z Trading, Inc., 276 A.D.2d 760, 715 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), entered December 21, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, among other things, preventing the transfer of certain assets.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiff failed to establish that it was entitled to a preliminary injunction (see, Credit Agricole Indosuez v Rossiyskiy Kredit Bank, 94 NY2d 541; Daley v Related Cos., 179 AD2d 55; Rosenthal v Rochester Button Co., 148 AD2d 375). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), entered December 21, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, among other things, preventing the transfer of certain assets.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiff failed to establish that it was entitled to a preliminary injunction (see, Credit Agricole Indosuez v Rossiyskiy Kredit Bank, 94 NY2d 541; Daley v Related Cos., 179 AD2d 55; Rosenthal v Rochester Button Co., 148 AD2d 375). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 760, 715 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-step-up-inc-v-coney-z-trading-inc-nyappdiv-2000.