One Plymouth Automobile v. United States

Fifth Circuit

One Plymouth Automobile v. United States

166 F.2d 431, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2349

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 1948

DocketNo. 12019

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 431 (One Plymouth Automobile v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

One Plymouth Automobile v. United States, 166 F.2d 431, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2349 (5th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our attention is called to an inaccuracy in our statement of the testimony of Riviera. He did not testify that an employee must have put two tires in his car, but that he must have done so in hauling new tires in it, but had forgotten them, and did not know they were in the car when he started across the bridge and had no purpose of taking them into Mexico. We do not undertake to settle what he said or any question of fact, but only to say that he claimed to have acted innocently, and was entitled to a jury trial in which the law should be stated to a jury, which should find the facts.

The motion for a rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our attention is called to an inaccuracy in our statement of the testimony of Riviera. He did not testify that an employee must have put two tires in his car, but that he must have done so in hauling new tires in it, but had forgotten them, and did not know they were in the car when he started across the bridge and had no purpose of taking them into Mexico. We do not undertake to settle what he said or any question of fact, but only to say that he claimed to have acted innocently, and was entitled to a jury trial in which the law should be stated to a jury, which should find the facts.

The motion for a rehearing is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 431, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-plymouth-automobile-v-united-states-ca5-1948.