One Moon Automobile v. State

1918 OK 190, 172 P. 66, 68 Okla. 109, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 303
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 9, 1918·No. 9009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILEY, J.

The parties hereto have stipulated that the same questions involved in No. 9008, One Cadillac Automobile et al. v. State, 68 Okla. 116, 172 Pac. 62, are involved herein, and that the same judgment should b-e rendered in this court in this case as in No. 9008.

It is therefore ordered that this -cause be and the same is hereby reversed and remanded, with instructions to restore the automobile to person -entitled to possession thereof for -the reasons stated, in the decision in said cause No. 9008, this -day decided.

All the Justices concur, except BRETT, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

One Moon Automobile v. State, 1918 OK 190, 172 P. 66, 68 Okla. 109, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 303 (Okla. 1918).

1918 OK 190 (One Moon Automobile v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. State
1918 OK 287 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)