One John Street Realty Co. v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

One John Street Realty Co. v. County of Suffolk

269 A.D.2d 580, 703 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2329

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 580 (One John Street Realty Co. v. County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

One John Street Realty Co. v. County of Suffolk, 269 A.D.2d 580, 703 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), entered October 23, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 10, 1998, denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the order dated September 10, 1998, is modified accordingly.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment to both parties. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), entered October 23, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 10, 1998, denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the order dated September 10, 1998, is modified accordingly.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment to both parties. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 580, 703 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-john-street-realty-co-v-county-of-suffolk-nyappdiv-2000.