One Fifty-Seven Prince Street Corp. v. Michelini

269 A.D. 967, 58 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4786

This text of 269 A.D. 967 (One Fifty-Seven Prince Street Corp. v. Michelini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
One Fifty-Seven Prince Street Corp. v. Michelini, 269 A.D. 967, 58 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think summary judgment was properly denied. We do not, however, adopt the opinion or reasoning of the learned Special Term. The facts and circumstances evidencing the intentions of the parties should be developed upon a trial.

Accordingly, the order appealed from denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Wasservogel, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. [184 Misc. 405.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

One Fifty-seven Prince Street Corp. v. Michelini
184 Misc. 405 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 967, 58 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-fifty-seven-prince-street-corp-v-michelini-nyappdiv-1945.