One Century City Apartment Corp. v. Great Pacific Century Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

One Century City Apartment Corp. v. Great Pacific Century Corp.

555 A.2d 605, 114 N.J. 480, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 821

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1989·Published

Opinion

Leave to appeal granted. The trial court’s grant of plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental complaint joining three additional defendants was not, under the particular circumstance presented, an abuse of discretion. The order of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, without prejudice to the right of any party to move before the trial court to sever, for the purposes of trial, the claims asserted in the supplemental complaint. See Rule 4:38-2(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal granted. The trial court’s grant of plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental complaint joining three additional defendants was not, under the particular circumstance presented, an abuse of discretion. The order of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, without prejudice to the right of any party to move before the trial court to sever, for the purposes of trial, the claims asserted in the supplemental complaint. See Rule 4:38-2(a).

One Century City Apartment Corp. v. Great Pacific Century Corp., 555 A.2d 605, 114 N.J. 480, 1989 N.J. LEXIS 821 (N.J. 1989).

Pincite

555 A.2d 605 (One Century City Apartment Corp. v. Great Pacific Century Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.