One (1) 2005 Chrysler 300, VIN 2C3JA63H110940 v. State
This text of One (1) 2005 Chrysler 300, VIN 2C3JA63H110940 v. State (One (1) 2005 Chrysler 300, VIN 2C3JA63H110940 v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00408-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ONE (1) 2005 CHRYSLER 300, VIN #2C3JA63H110940, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kenedy County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Dolores Reyes, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against her
in favor of appellee, The State of Texas. On August 13, 2014, the Clerk of this Court
notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August
12, 2014, and that the district clerk, Veronica Vela, had notified this Court that appellant
failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could
be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the
defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution.
On August 13, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was
delinquent in remitting a $195.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that
the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the
date of receipt of this court’s letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices and has failed to pay the
filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 11th day of September, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
One (1) 2005 Chrysler 300, VIN 2C3JA63H110940 v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/one-1-2005-chrysler-300-vin-2c3ja63h110940-v-state-texapp-2014.