Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc.

23 N.E.3d 1194, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1451

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 2015

Docket2014-1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.E.3d 1194 (Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc., 23 N.E.3d 1194, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Erie App. No. E-14-009, 2014-Ohio-4115. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ entry filed November 5, 2014:

“Whether, as an element of establishing a prima facie claim for retaliatory discharge under R.C. 4123.90, plaintiff must prove that he or she suffered a workplace injury.”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Kilbarger v. Anchor Hocking Glass Co., 120 Ohio App.3d 332, 697 N.E.2d 1080 (5th Dist.1997).

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1881, Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc., 6th Dist. Erie No. E-14-009, 2014-Ohio-4115.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI