On v. Kulak

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided July 1, 2024·No. 216, 2024·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ITSHAK ON and KEREN-OR ON, § §

Defendants Below, § No. 216, 2024 Appellants, § § Court Below: Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware §

KEVIN KULAK, § C.A. No. 2023-0011 §

Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: June 11, 2024

Decided: July 1, 2024

ORDER

On May 29, 2024, the Senior Clerk issued a notice directing the appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for the appellants’ failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. The notice was served on the appellants through the Court’s electronic filing system. The appellants have not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On v. Kulak, (Del. 2024).

On v. Kulak (On v. Kulak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.