On the Block Rest. & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

On the Block Rest. & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

27 A.D.2d 724, 279 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 724 (On the Block Rest. & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

On the Block Rest. & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 27 A.D.2d 724, 279 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of State Liquor Authority annulled, in the exercise of discretion, without -costs or disbursements, and cause remanded for reconsideration. The nub of the charges herein is that the petitioner corporation, in connection with its 196<P65 application for renewal of its license, concealed and "suppressed information concerning a loan made to. it by one Yglesias, and that the petitioner failed to keep and maintain on the licensed premises adequate and accurate books and records of the business. The record emphasizes Yglesias’ participation in the business. The present principal divorced her husband in May of 1964. He arranged the loans from Yglesias and has not participated' in the business since July of 1964. The said loans have been repaid and the record fails to show any violations since July, 1964. Since there were no violations prior to those here involved, it may well be that cancellation of the license was excessive punishment. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of State Liquor Authority annulled, in the exercise of discretion, without -costs or disbursements, and cause remanded for reconsideration. The nub of the charges herein is that the petitioner corporation, in connection with its 196<P65 application for renewal of its license, concealed and "suppressed information concerning a loan made to. it by one Yglesias, and that the petitioner failed to keep and maintain on the licensed premises adequate and accurate books and records of the business. The record emphasizes Yglesias’ participation in the business. The present principal divorced her husband in May of 1964. He arranged the loans from Yglesias and has not participated' in the business since July of 1964. The said loans have been repaid and the record fails to show any violations since July, 1964. Since there were no violations prior to those here involved, it may well be that cancellation of the license was excessive punishment. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 724, 279 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/on-the-block-rest-bar-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1967.