Omphil Care, Inc. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing
This text of Omphil Care, Inc. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing (Omphil Care, Inc. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Citiwide Auto Leasing, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Nightingale Law, P.C. (Michael S. Nightingale, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered January 24, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had timely and properly denied the claims based upon late notice of the accident and late submission of a claim form (see 11 NYCRR 65-2.4 [b], [c]). Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion.
Contrary to plaintiff's sole contention with respect to defendant's motion for summary judgment, defendant established that the denial of claim form at issue had been timely mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 11, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Omphil Care, Inc. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omphil-care-inc-v-citiwide-auto-leasing-nyappterm-2017.