Omoro Laron Collins v. State of Florida

192 So. 3d 580, 2016 WL 2906838, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7654
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2016
Docket4D15-385
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 580 (Omoro Laron Collins v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omoro Laron Collins v. State of Florida, 192 So. 3d 580, 2016 WL 2906838, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7654 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

OMORO LARON COLLINS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D15-385

[May 18, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Anne Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14004473 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found in direct criminal contempt of court. He contends that the court erred in finding that his isolated use of a profanity in court was sufficient to constitute a contempt, relying on Woods v. State, 987 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), disapproved of on other grounds, Plank v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S93 (Fla. Mar. 17, 2016). The State acknowledges, however, that the court erred in failing to include “a recital of those facts on which the adjudication of guilt is based.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.830. Without those findings, we cannot conclude whether the single profanity alone was the basis for finding appellant in contempt. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to make findings to support the order of contempt.

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woods v. State
987 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 580, 2016 WL 2906838, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omoro-laron-collins-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.