Omochaya & American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Omochaya & American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 318, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3734

United States Customs Court·Decided May 28, 1963·No. No. 67777; protests 61/24763 and 62/1277 (Honolulu)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to in the invoices as M-l and M-2, teapots; M-ll, sugar bowls; and M-12, creamers, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem; the items referred to as M-3, M-4, M-A-D, M-4-E, and M-4-E, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem; and the items referred to as M-13, beer mugs,, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 percent ad valorem, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to in the invoices as M-l and M-2, teapots; M-ll, sugar bowls; and M-12, creamers, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem; the items referred to as M-3, M-4, M-A-D, M-4-E, and M-4-E, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem; and the items referred to as M-13, beer mugs,, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 percent ad valorem, as claimed.

Omochaya & American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 318, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3734 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

50 Cust. Ct. 318 (Omochaya & American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.