Omilin v. Kratz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Omilin v. Kratz

38 A.D.2d 1006, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 1006 (Omilin v. Kratz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Omilin v. Kratz, 38 A.D.2d 1006, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

On the present record we find that the verdict in favor of plaintiff husband for loss of his wife’s consortium is excessive and should be reduced to $2,000. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, limited to the issue of damages to the plaintiff husband for loss of consortium, unless he shall, within 20 days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, stipulate to reduce the verdict for loss of consortium to $2,000 and interest, in which event the judgment, as so modified and reduced, is affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the present record we find that the verdict in favor of plaintiff husband for loss of his wife’s consortium is excessive and should be reduced to $2,000. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, limited to the issue of damages to the plaintiff husband for loss of consortium, unless he shall, within 20 days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, stipulate to reduce the verdict for loss of consortium to $2,000 and interest, in which event the judgment, as so modified and reduced, is affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 1006, 330 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omilin-v-kratz-nyappdiv-1972.