Omega OB/GYN Associates v. First Court of Appeals

890 S.W.2d 809, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 82, 1994 Tex. LEXIS 141, 1994 WL 626039
Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1994·No. No. 94-0302·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an order protecting mental health records from discovery. Both the trial court and the court of appeals rendered decisions prior to our writing in R.K v. Ramirez, 887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1994). We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of R.K. Accordingly, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings, we conditionally grant the writ and direct the court of appeals to vacate its opinion and order, and the trial court to vacate its order of March 8, 1994. Tex. R.App.P. 122. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the unlikely event they do not do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Omega OB/GYN Associates v. First Court of Appeals, 890 S.W.2d 809, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 82, 1994 Tex. LEXIS 141, 1994 WL 626039 (Tex. 1994).

890 S.W.2d 809 (Omega OB/GYN Associates v. First Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.K. v. Ramirez
887 S.W.2d 836 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)