Omega Jabbar Manning v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 24, 2012
Docket13-12-00058-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Omega Jabbar Manning v. State (Omega Jabbar Manning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omega Jabbar Manning v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00058-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

OMEGA JABBAR MANNING, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 258th District Court of Polk County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Omega Jabbar Manning, attempts to appeal his conviction for murder.

The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO

right of appeal, except as to punishment.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The

judgment indicates that the terms of the plea bargain were that the Court would assess punishment at no more than 70 years and no less than 25 years confinement with both

sides being allowed to present evidence at the punishment hearing. Appellant was

sentenced to 70 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

On March 20, 2012, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On April 17, 2012, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel reviewed

the record and responded that appellant did not get permission from the trial court to

appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 24th day of May, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Omega Jabbar Manning v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omega-jabbar-manning-v-state-texapp-2012.