OmarHill 851731 v. Bauman
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
IMEN GABRIEL OMARHILL,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:20-cv-17 v. Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou CATHERINE BAUMAN,
Defendant. ____________________________/
ORDER
This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on November 9, 2020, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendant. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). A Judgment will enter consistent with this Order.
Dated: December 10, 2020 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
OmarHill 851731 v. Bauman (OmarHill 851731 v. Bauman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.